![]() The puppy mills that made the list in no way represent all commercial breeding facilities that are in violation or are not treating animals well. Related: The 4 Things You Can Do to Fight Back Against the USDA’s Removal of Animal Welfare Data ![]() Because of this, the Horrible Hundred may not be able to release future reports. 3 the agency removed tens of thousands of animal-welfare reports from the websites, “based on our commitment to being transparent … and maintaining the privacy rights of individuals.” Some organizations, including HSUS, have filed a lawsuit against the USDA to get the records back online. To date, the USDA has put some of the records back up - focused on research labs and other dealers - but has restored no records pertaining to breeding facilities. ![]() The data gathered for the report came from state inspection reports, with most found on the USDA website. The report is released to draw attention to puppy mills and educate the public about the practice of commercial breeding. Also, one breeder received a 21-day fine for throwing two dead puppies at an inspector. Kennels with live worms, dogs with horrible eye infections and others with lacerations so deep muscle was exposed were just some of the observations. In possibly its last edition, the Humane Society of the United States has just released its “Horrible Hundred” puppy mill report, highlighting some of the worst known commercial breeders in the U.S.įor the fifth year in a row, Missouri topped the list with 19 offenders, followed by Ohio, Pennsylvania and Kansas, which all had 12 facilities make the list. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |